http://www.zeitgeistnyc.com Fri, 03 Dec 2010 19:16:50 +0000 hourly 1 http://www.zeitgeistnyc.com/2010/10/22/zeitgeist-panel-humanmachine-interaction/#comment-143 At the Zeitgeist Panel: Human-Machine Interaction | Redub LLC Fri, 03 Dec 2010 19:16:50 +0000 http://www.zeitgeistnyc.com/?p=530#comment-143 [...] Anyways, Freyja Ballmer, who sort of inherited my position at FEED after I left, asked me to talk at the first Zeitgeist NY Panel this past October. (Zeitgeist is a think tank/social club for digital people.) I gave a little talk on the future of reading. You can read more about what happened here. [...] [...] Anyways, Freyja Ballmer, who sort of inherited my position at FEED after I left, asked me to talk at the first Zeitgeist NY Panel this past October. (Zeitgeist is a think tank/social club for digital people.) I gave a little talk on the future of reading. You can read more about what happened here. [...]

]]> http://www.zeitgeistnyc.com/2010/10/07/the-cost-of-poetry-in-the-digital-age/#comment-142 October 9, 2010 | Poetry News in Review Wed, 01 Dec 2010 15:17:10 +0000 http://www.zeitgeistnyc.com/?p=421#comment-142 [...] by Jonathan Farmer Not so long ago, a minor shitstorm broke out in the literary outposts of the internet. The New England Review had announced that it would start charging for online submissions ($2 for poetry, $3 for fiction), and many rallied to condemn the magazine for making money on the backs of writers, aspiring and otherwise. To a large extent, the criticism seemed uninformed, even bizarre at times; some went so far as to accuse the editors of greed, as though they were getting rich off the magazine (they weren’t) and would be getting richer now (they would not). Most neglected to note that the NER was still accepting submissions free of charge by mail (aside, of course, from the existing costs of printing and shipping, which the costs of online submissions were meant to resemble), that $1 of the fee went to the online submission service NER was using, that subscribers could use the online option at no cost and, most importantly, that the magazine had no money—Middlebury College, its longtime benefactor, was following the lead of other universities and cutting off all funding for its literary magazine. Read more at Zeitgeist NYC. [...] [...] by Jonathan Farmer Not so long ago, a minor shitstorm broke out in the literary outposts of the internet. The New England Review had announced that it would start charging for online submissions ($2 for poetry, $3 for fiction), and many rallied to condemn the magazine for making money on the backs of writers, aspiring and otherwise. To a large extent, the criticism seemed uninformed, even bizarre at times; some went so far as to accuse the editors of greed, as though they were getting rich off the magazine (they weren’t) and would be getting richer now (they would not). Most neglected to note that the NER was still accepting submissions free of charge by mail (aside, of course, from the existing costs of printing and shipping, which the costs of online submissions were meant to resemble), that $1 of the fee went to the online submission service NER was using, that subscribers could use the online option at no cost and, most importantly, that the magazine had no money—Middlebury College, its longtime benefactor, was following the lead of other universities and cutting off all funding for its literary magazine. Read more at Zeitgeist NYC. [...]

]]> http://www.zeitgeistnyc.com/2010/09/30/the-future-of-the-humanmachine-interface-a-zeitgeist-panel-discussion/#comment-82 Zeitgeist NYC Panel discussion, Tuesday, 19 October, 7pm « Plainfront.com/Dan Paluska Mon, 18 Oct 2010 17:56:08 +0000 http://www.zeitgeistnyc.com/?p=334#comment-82 [...] http://www.zeitgeistnyc.com/2010/09/30/the-future-of-the-humanmachine-interface-a-zeitgeist-panel-di... [...] [...] http://www.zeitgeistnyc.com/2010/09/30/the-future-of-the-humanmachine-interface-a-zeitgeist-panel-di... [...]

]]> http://www.zeitgeistnyc.com/2010/10/07/the-cost-of-poetry-in-the-digital-age/#comment-65 “American poems ride into the world on the back of a capitalist economy whose aims they neither fulfill nor, in all but a few cases, embrace”: Jonathan Farmer on the Cost of Poetry in the Digital Age | E-Verse Radio Sat, 09 Oct 2010 15:48:09 +0000 http://www.zeitgeistnyc.com/?p=421#comment-65 [...] Jonathan Farmer on the state of poetry publishing today by clicking here or on the excerpt [...] [...] Jonathan Farmer on the state of poetry publishing today by clicking here or on the excerpt [...]

]]> http://www.zeitgeistnyc.com/2010/10/06/poetry-in-the-digital-age/#comment-61 Coding Poetry for Digital Publication « PWxyz Thu, 07 Oct 2010 15:12:22 +0000 http://www.zeitgeistnyc.com/?p=393#comment-61 [...] online magazine At Length came to the rescue by pointing me to a post they did on the blog Zeitgeist NYC about how they and others manage to code poetry so it looks just right online (and in [...] [...] online magazine At Length came to the rescue by pointing me to a post they did on the blog Zeitgeist NYC about how they and others manage to code poetry so it looks just right online (and in [...]

]]> http://www.zeitgeistnyc.com/2010/08/24/leds-are-the-new-sequins-fashion-crafting-and-wearable-technology/#comment-10 The Death of the Author (Long Live the Commenter!) | Zeitgeist NYC Tue, 31 Aug 2010 17:03:54 +0000 http://www.zeitgeistnyc.com/?p=210#comment-10 [...] commenter around, depending on the context.  For example, here’s a comment I made on Tammy’s recent post on wearable technology as it shows at the end of her [...] [...] commenter around, depending on the context.  For example, here’s a comment I made on Tammy’s recent post on wearable technology as it shows at the end of her [...]

]]>